STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS

Fin Attachment Strength

Mounting types, adhesive selection, and fillet sizing for secure fin attachment.

Back to Structural Analysis
01

Failure Modes

Fin joint failure is distinct from flutter:

Failure TypeCauseDepends On
FlutterAeroelastic instabilityFin geometry, material stiffness
Joint failureBond shear from aero loadMounting type, adhesive, fillet
A fin can flutter off (material fails) OR be ripped off (joint fails) — whichever limit is lower determines the maximum safe velocity.
02

Mounting Types

TypeStrengthBest For
Surface Mount1× (baseline)Low-power, slow rockets
Through-the-Wall (TTW)2-4×Mid-power and up
TTW to Motor MountMaximumHigh-power, supersonic
Surface Mount:      TTW to Motor Mount:
    Fin                    Fin
     |                      |
═════╪═════            ═══╪═╪═══  Body
                          │ │
                       ───┼─┼───  Motor mount
03

Adhesive Selection

AdhesiveShear StrengthNotes
Wood glue (Titebond)3-5 MPaPorous materials only
CA (cyanoacrylate)10-15 MPaBrittle, poor gap filling
5-minute epoxy8-12 MPaConvenient, moderate strength
30-minute epoxy15-25 MPaBetter strength, gap filling
West System 105/20520-30 MPaExcellent, standard for HPR
Rocketpoxy25-35 MPaOptimized for rocketry
04

Fillet Sizing

Fillets increase bond area and reduce stress concentration:

Recommended Radius
rfillet=2−3×tfinr_{fillet} = 2-3 \times t_{fin}

Tip-to-Tip Reinforcement

Laminating fins with fiberglass or carbon fiber tip-to-tip increases both joint strength and fin stiffness (raises flutter velocity).

SOURCES

References

NASA & Technical Reports

Community Resources

Try the Calculator

Put this methodology into practice with the interactive calculator.

Open Calculator