STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
Fin Attachment Strength
Mounting types, adhesive selection, and fillet sizing for secure fin attachment.
Back to Structural Analysis
01
Failure Modes
Fin joint failure is distinct from flutter:
| Failure Type | Cause | Depends On |
|---|---|---|
| Flutter | Aeroelastic instability | Fin geometry, material stiffness |
| Joint failure | Bond shear from aero load | Mounting type, adhesive, fillet |
A fin can flutter off (material fails) OR be ripped off (joint fails) — whichever limit is lower determines the maximum safe velocity.
02
Mounting Types
| Type | Strength | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| Surface Mount | 1× (baseline) | Low-power, slow rockets |
| Through-the-Wall (TTW) | 2-4× | Mid-power and up |
| TTW to Motor Mount | Maximum | High-power, supersonic |
Surface Mount: TTW to Motor Mount:
Fin Fin
| |
═════╪═════ ═══╪═╪═══ Body
│ │
───┼─┼─── Motor mount03
Adhesive Selection
| Adhesive | Shear Strength | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Wood glue (Titebond) | 3-5 MPa | Porous materials only |
| CA (cyanoacrylate) | 10-15 MPa | Brittle, poor gap filling |
| 5-minute epoxy | 8-12 MPa | Convenient, moderate strength |
| 30-minute epoxy | 15-25 MPa | Better strength, gap filling |
| West System 105/205 | 20-30 MPa | Excellent, standard for HPR |
| Rocketpoxy | 25-35 MPa | Optimized for rocketry |
04
Fillet Sizing
Fillets increase bond area and reduce stress concentration:
Recommended Radius
Tip-to-Tip Reinforcement
Laminating fins with fiberglass or carbon fiber tip-to-tip increases both joint strength and fin stiffness (raises flutter velocity).
SOURCES
References
NASA & Technical Reports
Community Resources
- Fin Flutter Analysis Revisited — Apogee Components
Peak of Flight #615 - Updated flutter and joint analysis
- Internal Fillets on TTW Fins
Rocketry Forum discussion on optimal fillet techniques
- Tip-to-tip carbon fibre reinforcement — Cambridge University Spaceflight
Advanced fin reinforcement techniques
Try the Calculator
Put this methodology into practice with the interactive calculator.